Difference between revisions of "Research/Image Schemas"
DavidWhitten (talk | contribs) |
DavidWhitten (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249941358_Exploring_image_schemas_as_a_critical_concept_Toward_a_critical-cognitive_linguistic_account_of_image-schematic_interactions | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249941358_Exploring_image_schemas_as_a_critical_concept_Toward_a_critical-cognitive_linguistic_account_of_image-schematic_interactions | ||
| − | + | ||
The first pertinent distinction is that image schemas can be | The first pertinent distinction is that image schemas can be | ||
schemas or which notions are image-schematic to begin with, some common examples are Containment, Support and Link (see Figure 2.1). Despite working on the topic of introducing novel image- schematic concepts and how to structure them, no concrete stand on which image schemas that should be counted into a canon of image schemas is made. Instead, conventions from the literature are used where already introduced image schemas and their primitives are written with small caps, spatial and conceptual primitives that are still up for general agreement are written in simple lower case. The only exception where novel image schemas are written with small caps are those that can be provided with empirical support. | schemas or which notions are image-schematic to begin with, some common examples are Containment, Support and Link (see Figure 2.1). Despite working on the topic of introducing novel image- schematic concepts and how to structure them, no concrete stand on which image schemas that should be counted into a canon of image schemas is made. Instead, conventions from the literature are used where already introduced image schemas and their primitives are written with small caps, spatial and conceptual primitives that are still up for general agreement are written in simple lower case. The only exception where novel image schemas are written with small caps are those that can be provided with empirical support. | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
6.3 Contain Image Schemas | 6.3 Contain Image Schemas | ||
6.4 Movement Schemas | 6.4 Movement Schemas | ||
| − | + | ==== Balance Schemas ==== | |
| − | + | ==== Object Image Schemas ==== | |
| − | + | ==== Multiple Objects ==== | |
Revision as of 23:31, 28 November 2022
Contents
References
There is a dissertation about Image Schemas at https://d-nb.info/121996610X/34
They are preverbal and while language and reasoning build from them, they are not in themselves learned from language. While there are discussions on which concepts should be included in the term image schema, a common restriction is to describe them as the generic spatiotemporal relationships 4 learned from the repeated in- teraction and perception with and of the environment and the objects therein.
From: 5 Ming-yu Tseng. Exploring image schemas as a critical concept : Toward a critical-cognitive linguistic account of image-schematic interactions. Journal of literary semantics, 36:135–157, 2007
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249941358_Exploring_image_schemas_as_a_critical_concept_Toward_a_critical-cognitive_linguistic_account_of_image-schematic_interactions
The first pertinent distinction is that image schemas can be
schemas or which notions are image-schematic to begin with, some common examples are Containment, Support and Link (see Figure 2.1). Despite working on the topic of introducing novel image- schematic concepts and how to structure them, no concrete stand on which image schemas that should be counted into a canon of image schemas is made. Instead, conventions from the literature are used where already introduced image schemas and their primitives are written with small caps, spatial and conceptual primitives that are still up for general agreement are written in simple lower case. The only exception where novel image schemas are written with small caps are those that can be provided with empirical support.
both static and dynamic
While there is currently no consensus on the number of image
.
List of ImageSchemas
Image_Schema/Static Image Schema Categories
Image_Schema/Orientational
Image_Schema/Above
==== Image_Schema/Below ==== space concepts involving IN-OUT, UP- DOWN, FAR-NEAR, CONTACT, CENTER-PERIPHERY, etc., whether they are prepositions (e.g. “in”, “on”), adverbs (e.g. “up”, “down”), nouns (e.g. “center”, “core”, “margin”), adjectives (e.g. “far”, “adjacent”), or verbs (e.g. “touch”, “connect”, “fall”).
Image_Schema/Up
Image_Schema/Down
Image_Schema/Center
Image_Schema/Periphery
Image_Schema/Topological=
=== Image_Schema/Forcedynamic
Image_Schema/Dynamic Image Schema Categories
=== Image_Schema/Spatial Schemas Image_Schema/Temporal_Schemas
Space Image Schemas
6.2 Force Image Schemas 6.3 Contain Image Schemas 6.4 Movement Schemas
